• The Secret World of Arrietty
     
      http://bartybooks.com/the-secret-world-of-arrietty.htm
  • Gone
     
      http://bartybooks.com/gone.htm
  • Wanderlust
     
      http://bartybooks.com/wanderlust.htm
  • This Means War
     
      http://bartybooks.com/this-means-war.htm
  • Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance
     
      http://bartybooks.com/ghost-rider-spirit-of-vengeance.htm
  • The Vow
     
      http://bartybooks.com/the-vow.htm
  • Safe House
     
      http://bartybooks.com/safe-house.htm
Home » dir » Unstoppable Live Footage

Unstoppable (2010)

Trains, Denzel and Tony Scott, again? Yeah, but this one’s so much better than that dreadful Pelham remake.

Unstoppable is a pulse-pounding runaway thrill ride with iron-sided save-the-day heroism on display courtesy of Washington, Pine and Dawson.

Spoil sports have been grousing that Unstoppable can’t possibly be “inspired by true events.” In fact, the runaway AWVR777 in Unstoppable is based on the real-life CSX8888 (crew) Y11615 incident that took place in 2001.

CSX8888 was a single engine pulling 47 cars, 22 of them loaded, for in-yard car switching. The Final Report on the CSX8888 incident is available on the Internet along with other accounts and documentation.

All six “gross errors” committed by the engineer responsible for CSX8888 are reproduced in Unstoppable, one of them being sugar coated with magic pixie dust, when the engine selector handle auto-magically pops out of “dynamic brake” and into “power” mode, with the throttle handle set to 8, the maximum setting.

The dynamic brake should never have been set during yard operations (gross error #4). Dynamic braking is optimal at speeds >=40MPH and it is ineffective at speeds <10MPH (except on AC locomotives, of which 8888 wasn’t).

The independent brake of the locomotive was also set, which nullified the alerter switch system, which would have otherwise acted as a circuit breaker to the incorrect selector and throttle settings.

All six gross errors really happened and had to be made in the proper sequence in order to result in a powered runaway.

Two CSX employees chased CSX8888 in a private vehicle to a grade crossing, because they feared that its engineer had suffered an heart attack at the controls. The engineer had already stepped off the moving train back at the yard (gross error # 3). The CSX employees intercepted CSX8888, but were unable to board it.

The runaway CSX8888 did have hazardous cargo on board, variously reported as two cars of molten phenol acid (CNN) or molten sulfur (local Ohio news sources), the latter being less hazardous than the former, although both are toxic. The two hazmat cars were in the middle of the train and they were not considered to be at risk if the train had derailed. The hazmat cars were far enough in, for the surrounding terrain, that they should have remained on the track even if an engine derailment had succeeded.

CSX8888 had an average speed of 30-35MPH and may have been going as fast as 47MPH at one point. Four attempts were made at derailing CSX8888, three by diverting it through sidings and one by using a portable derail. CSX8888 dislodged the portable derail and threw it from the tracks. All attempts to derail CSX8888 failed.

CSX8888 was eventually stopped by a pursuit locomotive, running in reverse, CSX6462 (crew) Q63615. Avoiding a collision course, CSX6462 had to run in reverse, which blindsided the engineer during right hand turns. That required the conductor to setup at the rear of the locomotive, now the front, so that the conductor could spot for his engineer. The maximum unloaded speed rating for CSX6462 was 30MPH. It had to achieve speeds in excess of 50MPH to catch up with CSX8888. This meant that the conductor’s end of CSX6462 swayed 18″ from side-to-side at times. Had CSX6462 derailed, there would have been no way for the conductor to survive. Life and limb were definitely at risk.

CSX8888 was stopped without loss of life, limb and/or property.

When CSX6462 caught up with the runaway, it coupled from the rear and then the engineer applied CSX6462′s dynamic brakes, to slow CSX8888 down, exercising great care not to break the train apart between the two locomotives. Once CSX8888 slowed to less than 11MPH, a prepositioned engineer was able to run alongside, board it and take control of CSX8888, bringing it to an orderly stop.

Almost all of these elements are incorporated into the story of Unstoppable, albeit in Tony Scott’s ScottFree way. It’s reality x2 and all of that’s in the service of delivering a ripping yarn.

The same people complaining about Unstoppable probably swallowed everything Scott & Co served up in Top Gun without chewing.

Unstoppable does make a point of belaboring the fact that the hoses for the air brake system were never connected, but that happens to be SOP for in-yard flat car switching. You can’t properly “kick” cars if their hoses are still connected. (That’s my only beef.)

There are plenty of other things that never happened, or couldn’t have happened, but none of that matters thanks to the acting talent on board.

Denzel Washington’s Frank Barnes is a seasoned engineer and 28-year AWVR veteran who never shows any of is his inward concerns, whether they be about job security in downsizing times or worry for his two daughters working their way through college. Denzel’s Barnes is all about the j-o-b and doing it right. Chris Pine’s Will Colson is relatively new to the ranks of conductors. Rumor in the yard is that Colson’s a beneficiary of union boss nepotism. Will’s also got domestic problems at home that distract him from the job. This sets up professional tension when Barnes are Colson are paired to crew AWVR1206 for a routine run. Although Barnes has seniority, Colson’s technically in charge. Pine & Washington have a lot of tension-cutting fun with this.

Rosario Dawson plays Connie Hooper, a rail control supervisor, who has got to plow through considerable BS, not only to find out what’s going on with double-engine AWVR777, but also to figure out how best to deal with it, once it’s determined that 777 is a fully powered runaway. Even after “corporate” cuts Connie out of the CBA/CYA loop, Dawson makes us believe that Connie is going to do the right thing, no matter what.

Kevin Corrigan deserves special mention for his turn as FRAMPE Inspector Werner. He convincingly supplies crucial factoids needed to solve the problem of 777, with a Spock-like just-in-time manner.

frank barnes, frank barnes and will colson, frank barnes train, the real frank barnes and will colson, connie hooper train, will colson
Home » dir » Unstoppable Live Footage

Yogi Bear (2010)

Completely Boring!!!

Between the 2010 horror film Bear, the creepy 2002 film The Country Bears, and this mess, I don’t think I’ve seen one single decent bear movie in years. The three all have one common problem of being mediocre films, but they both can be excused because at least they don’t use the dreaded CGI effects that this horrendous adaptation of the cartoon classic uses. I think I’d be complaining too if the film took The Country Bears route and used real bear suits, which only means this film couldn’t win no matter which direction it took. Unless it used the classic style of animation the timeless cartoon did. Now that is some wishful thinking.

The voice acting is the thing that redeems the film a little bit. Yogi’s voice isn’t perfect, but I accepted it since it was Dan Akroyd. Boo Boo’s voice wasn’t too bad either surprisingly since JT was the voice. While the voices aren’t that perfect, it’s one of the few high points the film does have. Pretty much everything else is two dimensional, loud. and overly silly. Like all kids movies now.

The story takes place where it should, Jellystone Park. There inhabits some of finest scenery, the freshest of air, and the talking, pic-a-nic basket stealing Yogi Bear. Jellystone Park starts taking a beating when tourists are attracted to amusement parks more than the wilderness. Mayor Brown (Andrew Daly) states that he will close Jellystone and sell the land. Yogi (Akroyd) and Boo Boo (Timberlake) make it their priority to team up with Ranger Smith (Tom Cavanagh) and Rachel (Anna Faris), a documentary filmmaker filming some of her movie at the park, to save Jellystone and it’s lovely scenery.

I just can’t get over the fact that this is LIVE ACTION. If something started out as a cartoon, just leave it has one. I’m sure Hanna-Barbera didn’t think in fifty years their beloved bear would be seen on the big screen complete in CGI and unnecessary 3D. This is the same execution taken during the film Alvin and the Chipmunks and the dreadful Scooby Doo movie. Make everything else live action, and leave the main star(s) for the CGI.

The one film where I can accept the fact it mixed live action with animation is Who Framed Roger Rabbit?. Besides being a fun film, it was also new for the time. Nothing like that had been done, and it didn’t go cartooning around with the audience. Plus it wasn’t just kid orientated, it had a lot of crude humor to itself that many adults would find fun. I can say with a straight face that if Who Discovered Roger Rabbit? does get made, this could certainly see a remake too, done with CGI. Lord have some mercy.

It’s also strange that the humans just cope with having a talking bear live in their park. If I was a ranger, and there were two talking bears living in my park that were stealing picnic baskets, and running around doing whatever they please. I think I’d either scream, or send them to a zoo. In the cartoon, the rangers didn’t seem to care if the bear could talk or what. But that was a CARTOON, they were supposed to be used to it. In a cartoon, logic doesn’t apply. There is such a thing as being overly cartoony, but back in the 50′s, 60′s, 70′s, and 80′s it was part of the act. Now shows like Spongebob Squarepants and pretty much every PBS show takes the “cartooning” WAY too far.

While watching this film, I couldn’t help but reflect on when I went to The Yogi Bear Campground many times during my childhood. The place was pretty much a traditional campground, but had various Yogi Bear themes. There was the Ranger Station, which served as the souvenir shop. It had a lake, similar to the one in the film, where people could go alone or with a friend out on the lake in a paddle boat. Plus it showed Friday night movies, and a Yogi cartoon frequently.

Besides having a lot to offer, it was miserable. Plain miserable for me. Me, my parents, and a lot of their friends with kids would get together and spend three days, two nights out there. Usually around Halloween weekend where a lot of events were held. No matter what year we went, it would be rainy and crappy. The campers were mediocre, very compressed, and somewhat unkempt, and being that we wouldn’t stay too long, my parents and I would refrain from taking a shower. So were already dirty, and all the time we spent outside in the rain probably made up for our missed showers. There are a lot of other events I don’t want to get into because I myself hate reflecting on them.

When I read in 2008 a CGI/live action adaptation of Yogi Bear was going to be made, I wasn’t surprised and I wasn’t happy. When the trailer premiered a few months ago I was ranting on it as well. I caved it and saw it to say I did, and came out sorry for my foolish actions. It will most likely keep the kid’s entertained because of it’s color, it’s loud effects, and flat out goofy premise. But with it’s lame jokes, abrupt, protruding CGI, and annoying human characters, Yogi Bear makes for an unnecessary and tedious trip to the theater.

robert durst, Where Does Robert Durst Live, shikobb, where does robert durst live in florida, where does robert durst live in florida now, where does robert durst live no
Home » dir » Unstoppable Live Footage

The Devil Inside Review

The movie is only about an hour and 15 minutes. Nothing after the credits and the credits are the slowest scrolling credits I’ve ever seen in my life. My assumption is that it scrolled so slowly because there weren’t a lot of people who worked on the film (since the cast was small and budget was low) and they didn’t want the run time to be so short as to devalue the movie and discourage people from paying to see it; thinking they wouldn’t get much bang for the buck. I guess they had to do something to extend it and this is what they chose.

It’s filmed in a found footage/documentary style that works for the movie. It doesn’t use too many cheap or jump scares. The only bad acting belonged to the chick who played Isabella Rossi. The most important character in the entire movie is actually the person filming everything named Michael and he gets the least amount of face time and dialogue. None of the footage would even exist if he wasn’t filming. Therefore, without him, no movie. He does express that during an MTV’s Real World type confessional. There actually is a story here. It’s not just a bunch of things happening on screen with no rhyme or reason. The story itself is very good. I like it. It’s not necessarily original but the way the movie ends, if there is a sequel, it would have to be filmed in a more traditional movie-making style. That means no found footage. I just gave something away if you’re paying attention.

There are intentional holes left in the movie that can only be answered with a sequel. Like Maria Rossi’s possession. Why was she chosen to be possessed, why did the demon who possessed her make her do what she did, and which demon possessed her? I think exorcism as a whole could be explored more since part of the theme of this movie is the law surrounding the act of exorcism and how it needs to change. Another theme is distinguishing between mental illness and possession; a separation of science and religion. I liked what they were doing here by exploring other aspects of an overused genre but all the questions weren’t answered. That’s not a bad thing. A different twist is similar to what was done in the movie Fallen and that concept was explained during the movie.

If you’re gonna see this, and I’d give this a thumbs up to see it, then go when there’s gonna be less people in the auditorium or see it at a reputable theater and that’s what I recommend for every movie anyway. This movie ain’t worth full price. Catch a matinĂ©e or half price or something. Dollar movie works too. It’s worth seeing in theaters.

This movie didn’t back down on violence. Just when I thought they weren’t gonna show certain things, they showed it and I appreciated that. No watering down here although I believe some brief nudity in one scene would have added to the realism. This also reminds me of REC but this isn’t anywhere near as good as that. REC, when watched under the right conditions, will stay with you for a while. It burns an image into your head that doesn’t go away and that’s what a good horror movie is supposed to do: make you look over your shoulder and around corners and through shower curtains and keeps you awake at night. REC does just that and gives a compelling story. This also has a good story that I’d really like to see continued if it makes enough money because, similar to REC, it appears there’s something bigger going on and this first installment only scratches the surface. It teases more and I believe it can deliver with a second movie.

The way the movie ends, there was a collective sigh of disappointment. It leaves you wanting more and since that’s what made people disappointed, I’d say it did its job. It also makes you wonder because there is something that happens in that last scene and you don’t know who the survivor is. That’s all I’ll say about that. The last scene was unique and a bit funny given the circumstances, I’ll give it that much. It was original. If that last survivor is who it should be, then we have a sequel if they ever make it and I’d love to see it at an equal or better level of quality. No complaints about the special effects which weren’t that many to begin with. I give this 7 out of 10 stars. Not a bad movie. Worth seeing. Not too scary but I’m sure some people will be affected by certain scenes because it doesn’t use too many tricks to get the job done. It has a very creepy scene that affects you as if you were watching the movie Session 9. It’s short but effective and that describes the entire movie. Just make sure to watch this with the right people in the right environment.


Fast Tube by Casper

the gray movie after credits, what happens in the movie atm, the gray ending after credits, what happens after the credits in the gray, the gray after the credits, atm movie ending

Page 1 of 1212345...10...Last »

54 queries. 0.823 seconds.