• The Secret World of Arrietty
     
      http://bartybooks.com/the-secret-world-of-arrietty.htm
  • Gone
     
      http://bartybooks.com/gone.htm
  • Wanderlust
     
      http://bartybooks.com/wanderlust.htm
  • This Means War
     
      http://bartybooks.com/this-means-war.htm
  • Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance
     
      http://bartybooks.com/ghost-rider-spirit-of-vengeance.htm
  • The Vow
     
      http://bartybooks.com/the-vow.htm
  • Safe House
     
      http://bartybooks.com/safe-house.htm
Home » dir » The Grey Movie Extra Footage Ending

The Grey Review

A lot of people will complain about this film not having enough action or being too introspective or whatever other reason they can think of not to like the film. But the reality is, this is a fantastic movie about survival when there is little to no chance of doing so. In fact, the film speaks about a lot of things. It speaks about man versus nature, about being male, and about the human spirit’s need to persist. What this film is not is an action-adventure or one about Liam Neeson punching wolves. No, the trailer really pulled a number on anyone expecting a loud movie about wolf killing.

The film’s setup is simple: Neeson’s bodyguard-like character to a group of men drilling in Alaska finds himself and several others having survived a plane crash and facing the cold, harsh wilderness in an attempt to get back to civilization. In said wilderness, they are faced with a pack of wolves who have had their space invaded by these men and are out for blood. The cast is mostly fantastic, but obviously Neeson shines in the lead role. He is the kind of hard-edged man we’ve seen of him recently, but like the rest of the cast, he is vulnerable. The film speaks a great deal about the male ego and what it means to actually be a man. We’re told that these men Neeson is protecting are some of the worst kind of men, being criminals and just general a-holes. But when faced with such impending doom, these men show their vulnerabilities. They come across as tough and gruff. Even Neeson plays things cold and disconnected, but over the course of the film we learn about each of the men, see the things they truly care about, and even see them face fear when they would otherwise not admit to being afraid. It’s a film that shatters the image of male machismo in a slow, thought provoking way.

Now, I’ve already mentioned that the film isn’t an action-adventure in the way that people might expect, but it is nonetheless heart racing (or stopping, take your pick). Nearly every minute of screen time is taken up by some kind of tension, and this is in part thanks to pure visual and audio goodness. The darkness surrounding the men, the sounds of trees breaking, or wolves howling. It all creates a frightening, edge of your seat atmosphere. And when the attacks come, they come quickly and quietly. It’s unsettling and has you bracing for more. It’s not just wolf attacks either. Nature is as much a killer of these men as the wolves, and facing the cold and an attempt to escape prove harrowing, and sometimes even fatal. It’s a film shot beautifully, but in that beauty is true terror, the kind of which few films these days can create. Sound is as much apart of that terror as it’s look, and the two combine fantastically.

The film is also fairly depressing. There is little hope here, and as the men come to face their individual fates, the sense of dread grows greater. This coupled with an ending that many may find disappointing will probably turn other viewers off. I, for one, was not. The movie is still quite fantastic despite it’s depressing tone, and even if the ending isn’t quite what we’d anticipate, there’s enough of a sense of finality in it that it seems justified. In other words, if all you expect is a film that is shallow and about what you see, instead of what you feel and think, then you will most likely be disappointed. But if you’re looking for an exciting, edge of your seat, thought provoking film with a lot to say, then The Grey is something you will probably enjoy. It’s certainly a heck of a good way to kick off a new year of cinema.

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gb1aTdC929w&feature=fvst]

the grey ending explained, the grey secret ending, the grey ending, the grey after credits, the grey surprise ending, the grey extra scene
Home » dir » The Grey Movie Extra Footage Ending

The Devil Inside Review

The movie is only about an hour and 15 minutes. Nothing after the credits and the credits are the slowest scrolling credits I’ve ever seen in my life. My assumption is that it scrolled so slowly because there weren’t a lot of people who worked on the film (since the cast was small and budget was low) and they didn’t want the run time to be so short as to devalue the movie and discourage people from paying to see it; thinking they wouldn’t get much bang for the buck. I guess they had to do something to extend it and this is what they chose.

It’s filmed in a found footage/documentary style that works for the movie. It doesn’t use too many cheap or jump scares. The only bad acting belonged to the chick who played Isabella Rossi. The most important character in the entire movie is actually the person filming everything named Michael and he gets the least amount of face time and dialogue. None of the footage would even exist if he wasn’t filming. Therefore, without him, no movie. He does express that during an MTV’s Real World type confessional. There actually is a story here. It’s not just a bunch of things happening on screen with no rhyme or reason. The story itself is very good. I like it. It’s not necessarily original but the way the movie ends, if there is a sequel, it would have to be filmed in a more traditional movie-making style. That means no found footage. I just gave something away if you’re paying attention.

There are intentional holes left in the movie that can only be answered with a sequel. Like Maria Rossi’s possession. Why was she chosen to be possessed, why did the demon who possessed her make her do what she did, and which demon possessed her? I think exorcism as a whole could be explored more since part of the theme of this movie is the law surrounding the act of exorcism and how it needs to change. Another theme is distinguishing between mental illness and possession; a separation of science and religion. I liked what they were doing here by exploring other aspects of an overused genre but all the questions weren’t answered. That’s not a bad thing. A different twist is similar to what was done in the movie Fallen and that concept was explained during the movie.

If you’re gonna see this, and I’d give this a thumbs up to see it, then go when there’s gonna be less people in the auditorium or see it at a reputable theater and that’s what I recommend for every movie anyway. This movie ain’t worth full price. Catch a matinĂ©e or half price or something. Dollar movie works too. It’s worth seeing in theaters.

This movie didn’t back down on violence. Just when I thought they weren’t gonna show certain things, they showed it and I appreciated that. No watering down here although I believe some brief nudity in one scene would have added to the realism. This also reminds me of REC but this isn’t anywhere near as good as that. REC, when watched under the right conditions, will stay with you for a while. It burns an image into your head that doesn’t go away and that’s what a good horror movie is supposed to do: make you look over your shoulder and around corners and through shower curtains and keeps you awake at night. REC does just that and gives a compelling story. This also has a good story that I’d really like to see continued if it makes enough money because, similar to REC, it appears there’s something bigger going on and this first installment only scratches the surface. It teases more and I believe it can deliver with a second movie.

The way the movie ends, there was a collective sigh of disappointment. It leaves you wanting more and since that’s what made people disappointed, I’d say it did its job. It also makes you wonder because there is something that happens in that last scene and you don’t know who the survivor is. That’s all I’ll say about that. The last scene was unique and a bit funny given the circumstances, I’ll give it that much. It was original. If that last survivor is who it should be, then we have a sequel if they ever make it and I’d love to see it at an equal or better level of quality. No complaints about the special effects which weren’t that many to begin with. I give this 7 out of 10 stars. Not a bad movie. Worth seeing. Not too scary but I’m sure some people will be affected by certain scenes because it doesn’t use too many tricks to get the job done. It has a very creepy scene that affects you as if you were watching the movie Session 9. It’s short but effective and that describes the entire movie. Just make sure to watch this with the right people in the right environment.


Fast Tube by Casper

the gray movie after credits, what happens in the movie atm, the gray ending after credits, what happens after the credits in the gray, the gray after the credits, atm movie ending
Home » dir » The Grey Movie Extra Footage Ending

Season of the Witch (2011)

Season of the Witch has a long and troubled history: production took place in November 2008 and it was originally supposed to hit cinema screens both in the UK and America in March 2010, but it was pulled from release, sat in limbo for several months, and seemed likely to bypass cinemas altogether and be quietly dumped straight onto DVD. Instead, additional footage was shot in September 2010 amidst rumours of extensive re-editing, and eventually a new release date of 7th January 2011 was announced. Initially intended as a dark, medieval horror film (rated R in America), it had been re-conceived – and was marketed as – a PG13-rated period fantasy/action-adventure.

The movie’s narrative is uncomplicated and relatively straight-forward: in the 14th century, veteran Crusaders Behmen and Felson (Nicolas Cage and Ron Perlman) grow weary of being ordered by the Church to slaughter women and children whose only crime is not being born Christian. Deserting, they set off on the long journey home and eventually reach eastern Europe to find it stricken with plague. The Catholic authorities have found a scapegoat for the spread of the disease: a young woman (Claire Foy) whose ‘confession’ of being a witch they obtained via torture. Arrested for desertion, Behman and Felson are offered a full pardon if they will transport the girl to a remote monastery, where the resident monks will perform a ritual to strip her of her powers, enabling her to be killed and thus ending the plague.

While nothing about the movie is particularly remarkable or ground-breaking, the cast all acquit themselves as talented professionals and for most of it’s running time Season of the Witch is an entertaining and watchable effort. There are a number of well-handled setpieces on the knights’ journey that whittle down their travelling companions, such as an attack by ravenous wolves that transform into hellhounds, and a perilous passage over a collapsing bridge.

And although the film doesn’t dwell on the wide-reaching effects of the plague, the Crusaders encounter some grisly and impressive sights: hundred of crows (carrion eaters, remember) circling over a city; a dying Cardinal (a cameoing Christopher Lee) hideously deformed by the disease; a starving dog – it’s body ridden with weeping sores – feasting on a corpse; an apparently lifeless village in which two inhabitants suddenly emerge to silently dump a body in the street, before retreating back inside; and an open mass grave full of liquefying cadavers. The movie also touches upon all the blood that has been shed in God’s name and the blinkered arrogance of those who claim to be His representatives. Some of the characters also express doubts: is the girl truly a witch? Is her early escape attempt merely the action of a terrified young woman who – understandably – wants to avoid being executed? And even if she does possess supernatural powers, is she responsible for the plague?

But eventually the travelling party arrive at the monastery… and the film goes horribly wrong. All the moral uncertainties are abandoned and the movie becomes a disappointingly conventional struggle between clearly defined Good and Evil. The all-action climatic setpiece is marred by hectic and muddled editing. But worse of all is what happens to the title character. In the trailer that played in cinemas prior to the film’s aborted release in early 2010, there were three shots taken from the movie’s climax as it was clearly originally conceived, before the film was substantially reworked: Claire Foy walking straight towards the camera in close up as the caged wagon burns and melts into molten scrap behind her; her then levitating – spinning – through the air, over the heads of her captors; and finally Foy grabbing Nicolas Cage by the throat and slamming him against a wall.

All those scenes are still in the film – but Foy is no longer in them. Instead, she’s been digitally removed from the footage and replaced by a CGI monster. Yes, that’s right – at the movie’s conclusion, the witch transforms into an unimpressive seven-foot-tall CGI winged demon that looks as though it’s wandered in from the final reel of The Golden Child (1986). Ugh. In my opinion it’s unnecessary, misguided and a complete mistake. For example, I thought the ‘levitation’ shot in the original trailer looked stunning… but in the released film, Foy merely morphs into a dodgy special effect, then blandly flies away. It’s hugely disappointing.

Hopefully the original ending, with the heroes battling a demonically-possessed Foy (as opposed to an enemy comprised entirely of pixels), will be included as an extra on the DVD. Even more ideally, I’d like to see a two disc set with the original director’s cut on one disc and the theatrically-released version on the other, but it’ll never happen.

Author: paperback_wizard from United States

where was mark r slaughter born

Page 1 of 5112345...102030...Last »

61 queries. 0.475 seconds.