• The Wicker Tree Review
     
      http://bartybooks.com/the-wicker-tree-review.htm
  • Man on a Ledge Review
     
      http://bartybooks.com/man-on-a-ledge-review.htm
  • One for the Money Review
     
      http://bartybooks.com/one-for-the-money-review.htm
  • The Grey Review
     
      http://bartybooks.com/the-grey-review.htm
  • The Front Line Review
     
      http://bartybooks.com/the-front-line-review.htm
  • Miss Bala Review
     
      http://bartybooks.com/miss-bala-review.htm
  • The Flowers of War Review
     
      http://bartybooks.com/the-flowers-of-war-review.htm

The Flowers of War Review

Crowd Report: Watched this movie on Christmas day. The crowd is a mix of seniors and Chinese speaking audience of various ages. Theater is about 60% full for a 2pm show. And adults please don’t bring young kids to this movie. Some scenes are so brutal I have to cover my eyes.

The critics reviews are terrible and I was on the fence about seeing this movie. Zhang Yimou’s films from the last ten years had been disappointing starting with “Hero”. I felt he caved in too much to commercial interests and government interference. But make no mistake, the critics are overly harsh on this film. Flowers of War is a solid film that worth seeing. It’s Zhang’s best in ten years.

1. About the “white man saving the native” angle – this is unfair criticism. Bale did have a lot of screen time but the movie’s heart really lies in the heroic act of 13 courtesans. Chinese audience totally get the reference when Yu Mo says prostitutes in China have a reputation – they are oblivious of their country’s troubles and have no national conscience – and they decide to change that with their actions. Bale’s character and transformation are really inspired by the 13 women and is the backdrop, not the center of the story, hence the title “Flowers of the War”.

2. About criticism of excessive sentimentality and far-fetched plot – Zhang used the reluctant hero archetype on Miller and the arc of story is relatively conventional. Zhang might have also used too many slow-mo shots and prolonged some sequences, but I feel the sentimental parts of the story are effective and consistent with his style. The characters are layered enough for me to believe their actions. For example, not all the courtesans are on board to replace students. Many of the courtesans think they are lying to the students to get them off the tower, but they decide to actually do it. Part of that decision is the desire to do what is courageous, and another part the motherly nature to protect the young and vulnerable. This aspect is probably a bit understated in the film, but it’s clearly there.

3. About the portrayal of Japanese soldiers – many critics accused this movie of one dimensional in portraying Japanese soldiers, I disagree. The most memorable Japanese character, played by Kobayashi, is obviously very cultured and very conflicted as well. The decision to take the student to the “party” seems to come from higher up in the military and not Kato’s decision to make. There are some stories there in the Japanese military I would liked to see explored. The actions of regular Japanese soldiers portrayed in this movie, however, is supported by historical testimonials and photographic evidence.

I found them accurate at the least and even watered-down. It’s pure hypocrisy to criticize this movie for giving an honest portrayal of brutality during Japanese Occupation of Nanjing and giving praises to movies that portray equally ghastly holocaust in Germany. And accusations that this movie is propaganda against Japan is simply unfounded – this is a war movie about courage, sacrifice and human compassion during very extreme circumstances. It simply make us reflect and appreciate the peace we are enjoying right now.

Some highlight worth mentioning: The boy who played George delivered a wonderful and nuanced performance. He even overshadows Bale in some scenes; The Nanjing dialect in this movie is great and adds considerable authenticity to the characters; the music is wonderfully low-key and appropriately Chinese.


Fast Tube by Casper

Haywire Review

A lot of people are just voting 1 for this film without any just cause other then they don’t want to like this film. I believe this film has flaws but as a whole, is a very unique and special experience. When I watched this film, it was not like any film that I had seen before, from the camera angles, sound choices, etc. I felt some of the sound choices were strange but it went with the whole flow of the movie.

This movie is NOT a standard action movie but more like watching art. There were few fight scenes but the fight scenes that are in the movie have a raw feeling to them and are extremely well choreographed. They are believable because the main character’s hand to hand fights are all one on one with the exception of one fight in which she is fighting two people. But it is believable because she gets a surprise attack on the two people. The other fights, she is fighting people her size except for one fight, in which she was getting her ass handed to her until someone else joined in and helped her.

I think people were either expecting an ACTION action movie or a Oscar worthy drama but this movie is neither. It has a very surreal feeling and it can be slow but it has a very real feeling to it as well and is more like an experience then a movie. The fight scenes alone are worth the price of admission, and seeing the birth of a legitimate female action star. Was her acting stellar? No but it was pretty good, especially for someone who has never acted before. She can only improve from here.

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hwcys2PUtsA&feature=fvst]

Underworld: Awakening Review

When details finally came out about “Underworld: Awakening,” my heart sunk a little. True, the second installment wasn’t very good, and the third was a prequel, but I was still looking forward to seeing further adventures of the vampire, Selene (Kate Beckinsale). As it turns out, she’s the only returning cast member. Everyone else is gone from the project, leaving her the one tie to a series (seemingly) well past its prime. “Awakening” also clocks in at under 90 minutes, making the first film’s two hours seem like days in comparison.

The plot this time around is told to us in the form of exposition. After “Evolution,” humans discovered that lycans (werewolves) and vampires exist, and decided to wage war against both mythical creatures. They decided that genocide was the only option, and all but wiped out both species. So, how did Selene manage to survive? Well, she was captured by some scientist folks who decided to keep her alive, but frozen, for the past twelve years. Michael (previously portrayed by Scott Speedman), her vampire-lycan hybrid lover, has presumably died.

So, you’ll be unsurprised to find out that Selene eventually escapes from her prison, fits back into that catsuit that she has grown accustomed to, and begins trying to find out just what the world has become in her absence. Of course, she still believes that Michael is still alive, so she sets out on a quest to find him. Meanwhile, she’s also getting random visions flashing in front of her. It turns out, as anyone who has seen Evolution will have assumed, she has given birth to a daughter, Eve (India Eisley), and the two are linked via their sight. She can see what Eve can see if they are close to one another.

The villain this time around is the head of the scientists, a man named Jacob (Stephen Rae). I suppose the humans are also the bad guys, as they want to kill any vampire they come across, although the one human whose name we learn, a detective named Sebastian (Michael Ealy), ends up helping Selene. She’s also eventually joined by another vampire, David (Theo James). Lycans also still exist, and they end up becoming more frequent as the film progresses after a plot twist is revealed that you’ll probably see coming from a mile away, if you haven’t already guessed it.

There isn’t really a central plot that’s worth discussing. “Underworld”: “Awakening’s” screenplay reads as both lazy and very loose. It’s hard to even reflect back on it and try to remember key moments. It doesn’t care about secondary characters (they’re plot devices), and it doesn’t care for its main one all that much either, although Beckinsale’s Selene does have to show a tad bit more emotion than in previous installments. But not much more.

Essentially, we’re here for the action scenes, which serve both as the main material as well as the glue that holds it together. In what is probably the most action-packed and gory iteration in this series, “Underworld”: “Awakening” certainly doesn’t have many boring moments. There’s no substance to the plot or characters, but if you’re watching the fourth “Underworld” film, chances are you don’t care about that kind of thing. You’re here to see Kate Beckinsale in a tight leather catsuit running around, doing flips off walls, shooting at anything that moves, and doing it all with a blue tinge. You get that with “Awakening.”

Initially, I couldn’t quite put my finger on why I still didn’t have a great time with this film. It did most of the things it needed to right, and was overall quite exciting. But it lacked substance, and I don’t just mean in its story and characters. Even at its worst point (“Evolution”), the “Underworld” series has always maintained some depth to the world that the characters inhabit. An entire back story was mapped out, and we understood the history of both supernatural clans. “Awakening” seems dedicated to both ruining and ignoring all of that previous work.

Here is a film that’s premise involves the destruction of the majority of both species’ members. Presumably, artifacts and historical documents were also destroyed, rendering much of the back story unknown to the survivors. Those who do know, like a man named Thomas (Charles Dance), have no proof of it and have no need to bring it up. The world is no longer an “Underworld” one; instead, it’s just a generic action movie with vampires and werewolves. All of the work that went into the crafting of this universe is destroyed with “Awakening.” It almost seemed like directors Måns Mårlind and Björn Stein went with this story just so that they didn’t have to include any depth, even if that depth is what made “Underworld,” well, “Underworld.”

Maybe I’m overthinking things. Like I said, you’re watching “Underworld: Awakening” to see Kate Beckinsale in a bunch of physics-defying action scenes while dressed in her character’s signature leather outfit. You get that here. The action scenes are slick and well-made, the lycans look better than they ever have before, and the ending sequence, involving at least three distinct battles, is satisfactory, even if the ending as a whole promises much more than it delivers. I did have a good time, even if this installment completely ignores all of the history and back story of its universe. This is a movie for the “Underworld” fans. If you’re one of them, you’ll have a good time here. Newcomers will want to start at the beginning. If you aren’t a fan, this one has less depth and more action than earlier iterations, so make your decision accordingly.

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bor9gCAB9qM&feature=fvst]


Page 3 of 6412345...102030...Last »

33 queries. 0.405 seconds.