• The Secret World of Arrietty
     
      http://bartybooks.com/the-secret-world-of-arrietty.htm
  • Gone
     
      http://bartybooks.com/gone.htm
  • Wanderlust
     
      http://bartybooks.com/wanderlust.htm
  • This Means War
     
      http://bartybooks.com/this-means-war.htm
  • Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance
     
      http://bartybooks.com/ghost-rider-spirit-of-vengeance.htm
  • The Vow
     
      http://bartybooks.com/the-vow.htm
  • Safe House
     
      http://bartybooks.com/safe-house.htm
Home » dir » In Unknown How Did Jurgen Know

Unknown (2011)

Dr. Martin Harris (Liam Neeson) and his wife Elizabeth (January Jones) fly into Berlin as he is going to attend a biotechnology conference with a colleague. As his wife tries checking into their hotel, Martin notices that one of his bags is missing. He takes a cab to go back and retrieve the bag. The taxi enters a crash and Martin is left unconscious, only to be saved by the driver, Gina (Diane Kruger). When Martin wakes up from a coma he sets out to find his wife. He discovers her at the bio conference but she claims that she does not know him and that another man (Aidan Quinn) is married to her and is the real Martin Harris. Martin sets out to reclaim his identity by tracking down Gina, who is now working as a waitress. He also employs the help of Ernst Jürgen (Bruno Ganz), who used to be a Stasi officer in East Germany. He specialises in tracking down people and Harris uses this skill to try and contact his friend Rodney Cole (Frank Langella) back in the USA.

Unknown was the wrong title. This is a film about identity loss and yet it includes a checklist of familiar scenarios and set pieces from a dozen other action films. The film commences intriguingly enough, mostly because of the slick, classical direction of Jaume Collet-Serra. He’s icily photographed film on location in Berlin and the omission of the shaky camera in these opening exchanges allows for smoother control. With this isolated and grey Cold War-like feel, it is hard not to be mildly drawn in by a curious, if familiar, premise.

The early intensity at least makes it interesting to see how the film will unravel. Unfortunately a lot of suspense is undone by some routine dialogue of the ‘that man is pretending to be me’ kind and some surprisingly flat revelations. Judging from the accent of the German doctor who aids Martin, I was expecting some crazed German mind games. But there’s too much Bourne here and a silly finale owes more than a little to the superior Salt from last year. The two writers credited to the screenplay were unimaginative enough to even include a digital readout bomb that needs to be disarmed. In between, there are some tired car chases and fist fights, chaotically edited, with the shaky cam and rapid cutting rearing their ugly heads. Any subtext relating to the submissive identities of migrants runs second to clichés like black four wheel drives and trained assassins.

Liam Neeson is an experienced and decorated performer so it’s problematic that he’s still in Taken-mode. With a gruff American accent and one expression on his face, glum, he lends himself to a tough but highly monotonous performance. Nearly sixty-years-old, what is Neeson’s interest in choosing these action roles and bit parts? Even he cannot bring credibility to embarrassing lines like, ‘I haven’t forgotten how to kill you asshole’. It’s Neeson’s movie and yet his character is surprisingly underwritten, mostly to mask the final plot twist. More appealing support is provided by Diane Kruger (from Inglorious Basterds) and Bruno Ganz (Downfall). He has some of the best lines in the film, like when he describes his cigarette flavour as killing more Russians than Stalin and he brings some tension and ambiguity to the plot. The talents of Langella are just wasted though because he arrives very late in the film, with the sole intent of explaining the film’s denouement. The film is not as primitive or as offensive as Taken, it is occasionally intense and involving, but even Dr. Martin would have trouble escaping the nostalgia.

newbiemovie com, the grey after credits, www newbiemovie com, how does the movie the grey end, newbiemovie com diane kruger, rodney cole leipzig
Home » dir » In Unknown How Did Jurgen Know

Zookeeper (2011)

After reading some of the reviews for this movie, it is absolutely clear that most of the previous reviewers didn’t get the point of the movie. It is a FAMILY movie.

You don’t go to movies to see what you can pick apart, and then write a review that is already predisposed negatively against it. That’s just stupid. Anyone who goes into a movie with the attitude they are going to hate the movie no matter, and writes an extremely negative review is an idiot. The reason to go to movies is to be entertained.

Zookeeper was a movie that entertained. The performances by all the cast members were very well done. There were a lot of laughs, and there was a lot of fun. My son, who by the way is 7, was in the perfect demographic for this movie. It had interesting characters, and situations.

For an adult, a movie with talking animals might not be your cup of tea, but for a small child, it is awesome. Yes, a child thinks it’s funny when someone smashes into something or someone. Yes, for an adult, the movie might seem predictable, but truthfully, what movie isn’t somewhat predictable? A young child (for whom the movie was made for) isn’t going to be scrutinizing every tiny, single thing in a movie, just to say, ” A-HA! SEE, I KNEW IT!”. A child goes to the movies to be lost in imagination. My son laughed when there was a funny part. Whether it was funny because of the animals, or the humans, I heard a lot of laughter. And yes, I laughed a lot too, and so did my wife.

I believe that anyone who goes into this movie with the understanding that this is a movie targeted towards families with young children, that they will be entertained. This movie hits the mark for the appropriate audience members it was made for.

the grey after credits, atm movie spoiler, the grey ending, atm movie spoiler ending, shame spoiler, shame movie spoiler
Home » dir » In Unknown How Did Jurgen Know

Underworld: Awakening Review

When details finally came out about “Underworld: Awakening,” my heart sunk a little. True, the second installment wasn’t very good, and the third was a prequel, but I was still looking forward to seeing further adventures of the vampire, Selene (Kate Beckinsale). As it turns out, she’s the only returning cast member. Everyone else is gone from the project, leaving her the one tie to a series (seemingly) well past its prime. “Awakening” also clocks in at under 90 minutes, making the first film’s two hours seem like days in comparison.

The plot this time around is told to us in the form of exposition. After “Evolution,” humans discovered that lycans (werewolves) and vampires exist, and decided to wage war against both mythical creatures. They decided that genocide was the only option, and all but wiped out both species. So, how did Selene manage to survive? Well, she was captured by some scientist folks who decided to keep her alive, but frozen, for the past twelve years. Michael (previously portrayed by Scott Speedman), her vampire-lycan hybrid lover, has presumably died.

So, you’ll be unsurprised to find out that Selene eventually escapes from her prison, fits back into that catsuit that she has grown accustomed to, and begins trying to find out just what the world has become in her absence. Of course, she still believes that Michael is still alive, so she sets out on a quest to find him. Meanwhile, she’s also getting random visions flashing in front of her. It turns out, as anyone who has seen Evolution will have assumed, she has given birth to a daughter, Eve (India Eisley), and the two are linked via their sight. She can see what Eve can see if they are close to one another.

The villain this time around is the head of the scientists, a man named Jacob (Stephen Rae). I suppose the humans are also the bad guys, as they want to kill any vampire they come across, although the one human whose name we learn, a detective named Sebastian (Michael Ealy), ends up helping Selene. She’s also eventually joined by another vampire, David (Theo James). Lycans also still exist, and they end up becoming more frequent as the film progresses after a plot twist is revealed that you’ll probably see coming from a mile away, if you haven’t already guessed it.

There isn’t really a central plot that’s worth discussing. “Underworld”: “Awakening’s” screenplay reads as both lazy and very loose. It’s hard to even reflect back on it and try to remember key moments. It doesn’t care about secondary characters (they’re plot devices), and it doesn’t care for its main one all that much either, although Beckinsale’s Selene does have to show a tad bit more emotion than in previous installments. But not much more.

Essentially, we’re here for the action scenes, which serve both as the main material as well as the glue that holds it together. In what is probably the most action-packed and gory iteration in this series, “Underworld”: “Awakening” certainly doesn’t have many boring moments. There’s no substance to the plot or characters, but if you’re watching the fourth “Underworld” film, chances are you don’t care about that kind of thing. You’re here to see Kate Beckinsale in a tight leather catsuit running around, doing flips off walls, shooting at anything that moves, and doing it all with a blue tinge. You get that with “Awakening.”

Initially, I couldn’t quite put my finger on why I still didn’t have a great time with this film. It did most of the things it needed to right, and was overall quite exciting. But it lacked substance, and I don’t just mean in its story and characters. Even at its worst point (“Evolution”), the “Underworld” series has always maintained some depth to the world that the characters inhabit. An entire back story was mapped out, and we understood the history of both supernatural clans. “Awakening” seems dedicated to both ruining and ignoring all of that previous work.

Here is a film that’s premise involves the destruction of the majority of both species’ members. Presumably, artifacts and historical documents were also destroyed, rendering much of the back story unknown to the survivors. Those who do know, like a man named Thomas (Charles Dance), have no proof of it and have no need to bring it up. The world is no longer an “Underworld” one; instead, it’s just a generic action movie with vampires and werewolves. All of the work that went into the crafting of this universe is destroyed with “Awakening.” It almost seemed like directors Måns Mårlind and Björn Stein went with this story just so that they didn’t have to include any depth, even if that depth is what made “Underworld,” well, “Underworld.”

Maybe I’m overthinking things. Like I said, you’re watching “Underworld: Awakening” to see Kate Beckinsale in a bunch of physics-defying action scenes while dressed in her character’s signature leather outfit. You get that here. The action scenes are slick and well-made, the lycans look better than they ever have before, and the ending sequence, involving at least three distinct battles, is satisfactory, even if the ending as a whole promises much more than it delivers. I did have a good time, even if this installment completely ignores all of the history and back story of its universe. This is a movie for the “Underworld” fans. If you’re one of them, you’ll have a good time here. Newcomers will want to start at the beginning. If you aren’t a fan, this one has less depth and more action than earlier iterations, so make your decision accordingly.

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bor9gCAB9qM&feature=fvst]

ATM film 2012 full plot, ATM Movie plot, cast members of underworld awakening, CATSUIT HEIST, the awakening plot, the awakening plot film twist

Page 1 of 4012345...102030...Last »

56 queries. 0.647 seconds.