• The Secret World of Arrietty
     
      http://bartybooks.com/the-secret-world-of-arrietty.htm
  • Gone
     
      http://bartybooks.com/gone.htm
  • Wanderlust
     
      http://bartybooks.com/wanderlust.htm
  • This Means War
     
      http://bartybooks.com/this-means-war.htm
  • Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance
     
      http://bartybooks.com/ghost-rider-spirit-of-vengeance.htm
  • The Vow
     
      http://bartybooks.com/the-vow.htm
  • Safe House
     
      http://bartybooks.com/safe-house.htm
Home » dir » Ending Of The Gray Liam Neeson

The Grey Review

A lot of people will complain about this film not having enough action or being too introspective or whatever other reason they can think of not to like the film. But the reality is, this is a fantastic movie about survival when there is little to no chance of doing so. In fact, the film speaks about a lot of things. It speaks about man versus nature, about being male, and about the human spirit’s need to persist. What this film is not is an action-adventure or one about Liam Neeson punching wolves. No, the trailer really pulled a number on anyone expecting a loud movie about wolf killing.

The film’s setup is simple: Neeson’s bodyguard-like character to a group of men drilling in Alaska finds himself and several others having survived a plane crash and facing the cold, harsh wilderness in an attempt to get back to civilization. In said wilderness, they are faced with a pack of wolves who have had their space invaded by these men and are out for blood. The cast is mostly fantastic, but obviously Neeson shines in the lead role. He is the kind of hard-edged man we’ve seen of him recently, but like the rest of the cast, he is vulnerable. The film speaks a great deal about the male ego and what it means to actually be a man. We’re told that these men Neeson is protecting are some of the worst kind of men, being criminals and just general a-holes. But when faced with such impending doom, these men show their vulnerabilities. They come across as tough and gruff. Even Neeson plays things cold and disconnected, but over the course of the film we learn about each of the men, see the things they truly care about, and even see them face fear when they would otherwise not admit to being afraid. It’s a film that shatters the image of male machismo in a slow, thought provoking way.

Now, I’ve already mentioned that the film isn’t an action-adventure in the way that people might expect, but it is nonetheless heart racing (or stopping, take your pick). Nearly every minute of screen time is taken up by some kind of tension, and this is in part thanks to pure visual and audio goodness. The darkness surrounding the men, the sounds of trees breaking, or wolves howling. It all creates a frightening, edge of your seat atmosphere. And when the attacks come, they come quickly and quietly. It’s unsettling and has you bracing for more. It’s not just wolf attacks either. Nature is as much a killer of these men as the wolves, and facing the cold and an attempt to escape prove harrowing, and sometimes even fatal. It’s a film shot beautifully, but in that beauty is true terror, the kind of which few films these days can create. Sound is as much apart of that terror as it’s look, and the two combine fantastically.

The film is also fairly depressing. There is little hope here, and as the men come to face their individual fates, the sense of dread grows greater. This coupled with an ending that many may find disappointing will probably turn other viewers off. I, for one, was not. The movie is still quite fantastic despite it’s depressing tone, and even if the ending isn’t quite what we’d anticipate, there’s enough of a sense of finality in it that it seems justified. In other words, if all you expect is a film that is shallow and about what you see, instead of what you feel and think, then you will most likely be disappointed. But if you’re looking for an exciting, edge of your seat, thought provoking film with a lot to say, then The Grey is something you will probably enjoy. It’s certainly a heck of a good way to kick off a new year of cinema.

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gb1aTdC929w&feature=fvst]

the grey ending explained, the grey secret ending, the grey ending, the grey after credits, the grey surprise ending, the grey extra scene
Home » dir » Ending Of The Gray Liam Neeson

Unknown (2011)

Dr. Martin Harris (Liam Neeson) and his wife Elizabeth (January Jones) fly into Berlin as he is going to attend a biotechnology conference with a colleague. As his wife tries checking into their hotel, Martin notices that one of his bags is missing. He takes a cab to go back and retrieve the bag. The taxi enters a crash and Martin is left unconscious, only to be saved by the driver, Gina (Diane Kruger). When Martin wakes up from a coma he sets out to find his wife. He discovers her at the bio conference but she claims that she does not know him and that another man (Aidan Quinn) is married to her and is the real Martin Harris. Martin sets out to reclaim his identity by tracking down Gina, who is now working as a waitress. He also employs the help of Ernst Jürgen (Bruno Ganz), who used to be a Stasi officer in East Germany. He specialises in tracking down people and Harris uses this skill to try and contact his friend Rodney Cole (Frank Langella) back in the USA.

Unknown was the wrong title. This is a film about identity loss and yet it includes a checklist of familiar scenarios and set pieces from a dozen other action films. The film commences intriguingly enough, mostly because of the slick, classical direction of Jaume Collet-Serra. He’s icily photographed film on location in Berlin and the omission of the shaky camera in these opening exchanges allows for smoother control. With this isolated and grey Cold War-like feel, it is hard not to be mildly drawn in by a curious, if familiar, premise.

The early intensity at least makes it interesting to see how the film will unravel. Unfortunately a lot of suspense is undone by some routine dialogue of the ‘that man is pretending to be me’ kind and some surprisingly flat revelations. Judging from the accent of the German doctor who aids Martin, I was expecting some crazed German mind games. But there’s too much Bourne here and a silly finale owes more than a little to the superior Salt from last year. The two writers credited to the screenplay were unimaginative enough to even include a digital readout bomb that needs to be disarmed. In between, there are some tired car chases and fist fights, chaotically edited, with the shaky cam and rapid cutting rearing their ugly heads. Any subtext relating to the submissive identities of migrants runs second to clichés like black four wheel drives and trained assassins.

Liam Neeson is an experienced and decorated performer so it’s problematic that he’s still in Taken-mode. With a gruff American accent and one expression on his face, glum, he lends himself to a tough but highly monotonous performance. Nearly sixty-years-old, what is Neeson’s interest in choosing these action roles and bit parts? Even he cannot bring credibility to embarrassing lines like, ‘I haven’t forgotten how to kill you asshole’. It’s Neeson’s movie and yet his character is surprisingly underwritten, mostly to mask the final plot twist. More appealing support is provided by Diane Kruger (from Inglorious Basterds) and Bruno Ganz (Downfall). He has some of the best lines in the film, like when he describes his cigarette flavour as killing more Russians than Stalin and he brings some tension and ambiguity to the plot. The talents of Langella are just wasted though because he arrives very late in the film, with the sole intent of explaining the film’s denouement. The film is not as primitive or as offensive as Taken, it is occasionally intense and involving, but even Dr. Martin would have trouble escaping the nostalgia.

newbiemovie com, the grey after credits, www newbiemovie com, how does the movie the grey end, newbiemovie com diane kruger, rodney cole leipzig
Home » dir » Ending Of The Gray Liam Neeson

The Next Three Days (2010)

Consider yourself an every day type of person? If you’re married, how well do you really know your spouse? Beyond every shadow of any doubt? And just far would you go to save her/him from a gross miscarriage of justice, after every legal recourse has failed? Could you forsake all of your worldly possessions? Would you be willing to leave behind your one and only old child, a six year old, as part of the price of freedom? Willing to risk being shot on sight? What about always wondering if law enforcement is going to kick down your door in the middle of the night? Going on the run requires money and money always runs out when on the run.

Can you live with ‘all’ of that? If you can’t…

All of the above fueled the well received 2008 French crime thriller, Anything for Her, the directorial debut of screenwriter Fred Cavayé. Paul Haggis’ The Next Three Days is the American remake, trading Paris/Europe for Pittsburgh/North America — and Cavayé is very pleased by all of that.

Three years. That’s the time interval over which Russell Crowe’s sheepish, straight arrow, community college English lit professor, John Brennan, has to reckon with his wife Lara’s (Elizabeth Banks) sudden arrest and quick conviction for the brutal parking lot murder of her boss. In the absence of new evidence, every viable avenue of appeal is now exhausted. The pace of the film in this section is deliberately slow, like a wet fuse that threatens to quit with every sputter, provoking the patience of some audience members, in the same way that these three years have worn down John, Lara and their six year old son Luke.

Three weeks. Facing life in prison without possibility of parole, Lara attempts suicide. Failing that, she chides John for never once having asked her if she committed the crime, strongly implying that his steadfast belief in her innocence is wrong. It’s a startling, hardboiled moment. John rocks Lara to the verge of tears with a fiercely gentle insistence that he knows her far better than that. Then he calmly promises her that the rest of her life won’t be spent in prison. John means it and that ignites a second, measured fuse of searching, plotting, tinkering and flailing to get her out, by any means necessary.

Three days. Seventy-two hours notice is given that Lara is to be moved out of county lockup to a remote state prison. All of John’s site-specific preparations to spring Lara are about to go up in smoke. Heaping measures of white-hot desperation and sheer dumb luck fuel a now go-for-broke, chutes-and-ladders prison break action/thriller.

Obtaining run money, forged passports, drivers licenses and credit-worthy stolen identities are beyond the grasp of mild manners. There’s no more time for any more half-measures. Will they or won’t they beat the 15/35 minute municipal lockdown perimeters? Will Luke be left behind? Will they get away or will they be caught? Even if you think you know, you never know just how.

In the Three Weeks section, John’s Internet searches lead him to Damon Pennington (Liam Neeson), an author who has written a book about his experience escaping from prison seven times. In the French original, Pennington’s counterpart becomes a directly engaged mentor to the protagonist for an extended portion of the story. Director/writer Haggis boils the role down to a single, compelling scene, in which Neeson’s Pennington primes Crowe’s John for what will be an arduous and profoundly solitary quest to become a desperately competent escape artist. Neesom sells it without resorting to any Obi-Wan Kenobi/Yoda/Qui-Gon artifice, and then he is gone.

At points, the film threatens to lose it’s way over YouTube-for-Dummies tutorials on bump keys and tennis ball pneumatic plungers, but then quickly reestablishes a coherent context in the service of story. (It’s a minor blessing that the bump key prominently shown on screen isn’t fit for real-world duty.) Haggis’ emphasis is on John’s native intelligence and his refusal to engage any co-conspirators (not even Lara). John’s fallibility, desperation and nagging decency (when escrow on the family home won’t close in time, he can’t bring himself to rob a bank) all work against, as much as for, Lara’s and his own sake. The psychological wear and tear of John’s solitary second life all plays up to a poignant father-son scene, between Brian Dennehy and Crowe, that can be taken either way as slip-up or shrewd intention.

Yes, there are a few almost unbelievable moments, but cleverness and luck are the deciding factors here, just as they sometimes are in real life.

The success or failure of tN3D as entertainment depends entirely on three things, all of them acting, Crowe and Banks and the supporting cast filling out the seriously tenacious law enforcement roles.

None of the smart intricacies of Haggis’ script work without the uniformly excellent contributions of all the actors, particularly Crowe, who carries the film with the tenacity of a gladiator, while relying mostly on the finer muscles of intimate character acting. Banks encapsulates a woman’s who is always tough to love, but who is all the more to be loved for it, even when she’s totally glammed down. Lara’s got a tough exterior, but, inside, she’s on the brink of quitting.

Danny Elfman’s score is beautifully restrained and subtle, too. I had no idea it was his work until I saw the end credits.

Haggis makes quite a living out of polishing the scripts of other writers that somehow got greenlit despite being turds. This remake is completely able to stand on its own, as well as stand in good comparison with the French original. Cavayé is quoted as saying that he is honored by Haggis and can’t wait to see tN3D himself. How often does that happen?

I’m glad I caught this one. It’s very good entertainment.

jurgen section 15, how did jürgen know cole was section15, jurgen know that cole was section 15, malvern bump, the gray credit scene, who was the real damon pennington

Page 1 of 1212345...10...Last »

58 queries. 0.518 seconds.