• The Secret World of Arrietty
     
      http://bartybooks.com/the-secret-world-of-arrietty.htm
  • Gone
     
      http://bartybooks.com/gone.htm
  • Wanderlust
     
      http://bartybooks.com/wanderlust.htm
  • This Means War
     
      http://bartybooks.com/this-means-war.htm
  • Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance
     
      http://bartybooks.com/ghost-rider-spirit-of-vengeance.htm
  • The Vow
     
      http://bartybooks.com/the-vow.htm
  • Safe House
     
      http://bartybooks.com/safe-house.htm
Home » dir » David Marks & Katie Mccarthy True Story

All Good Things (2010)

ALL THINGS GOOD is a polished little film based on a true story that while it may not have the visual gruesome detail of the usual thriller tropes of films, it is terrifying in its presentation of personality variations that produce a shuddering reaction on a purely intellectual level for the audience. It is both a love story and a missing persons/murder mystery based on a still unsolved case that continues to haunt New York investigators and reporters and detectives.

What writers Marcus Hinchey and Marc Smerling have created from known and newly discovered facts, speculation and court records results in a psychological examination of a powerful New York family, obsession, love and loss. The film relates incidents that began in 1972 and end in 2003 and at this time the truth is still unknown. Director Andrew Jarecki uses a superb cast and a fine sense of voice-over narration to interweave the puzzling history with the gradual dissolution of each of the characters involved.

Sanford Marks (Frank Langella) is one of the wealthiest owners of Manhattan real estate, the current head of a family that has long dominated the New York scene with its power and money. Marks is aging and is relying on his son David (Ryan Gosling) to take over the family business: he sends David out to the brothels, and filthy hotels and porn houses to collect rent. David is reticent to be a part of his father’s business: he is a deeply disturbed young man, having witnessed his mother’s suicide leap as a child. David meets a tenant in one of the properties – Katie McCarthy (Kirsten Dunst) who longs to go to medical school but at present has no income to support that dream. The chemistry between the two is magnetic and despite David’s father’s objection that Katie is not of ‘their kind of people’, David decides to marry Katie and move to Vermont to open a Health Foods store – a move that makes the couple ecstatic, but is financed by Sanford Marks who eventually convinces David to sell his haven and move to New York to stay with the family business.

In their Manhattan home (and in their country lake front home!) the couple flourishes until Katie mentions she’d like to have children – a force that drives David back into violent behavior resulting form his witnessing his mother’s suicide: David can’t understand why Katie would want anything but the obvious life of wealth they enjoy. The shell is cracked and the subsequent events include Katie becoming pregnant only to be forced by David to terminate the pregnancy, Katie’s disappearance after uncovering the facts about the sources of wealth of the family, David’s descent into drugs and irresponsible behavior, and ultimately his leaving New York for Galveston, Texas where he lives a life disguised as a woman, his only friend being another old runaway Melvin Bump (Philip Baker Hall) who David engages to do away with a ‘problem confidant’ (Lilly Rabe), after which Bump is killed and dissected and tossed into the river. The murders are never solved nor is the mystery of Katie’ disappearance. A trial (the source of the voice-over throughout the film has been the lawyer’s interrogation of David in the year 2003) fails to resolve anything and the film ends with the message that David Marks is at present a real estate broker in Florida.

Frank Langella is superb as the heartless father who drives his family like cattle in the quest of power and wealth. Ryan Gosling offer a multifaceted performance of the deeply disturbed David and is match by Kirsten Dunst’s bravura performance as Katie, the simple bright girl whose life is quashed by a powerful family’s sickness. The brilliant cast, including the performances by Philip Baker Hall and Lilly Rabe – daughter of the deceased Jill Clayburgh), has excellent cameo roles by Diane Venora, Trini Alvarado, David Margulies, Nick Offerman and many more. This is a tough film to watch because at the bottom of it all is that it is true and the cases are unsolved. It makes us cringe but it is a very fine film.

david marx murder, david marx real estate, katie mccarthy missing person, katie mccarthy missing, katie marx missing, ryan gosling in sarasota
Home » dir » David Marks & Katie Mccarthy True Story

Beastly Movie Spoiler (2011)

Rob (PETER KRAUSE) is a well-known & rich TV broadcaster. He’s gotten where he is on his good looks, & his mantra is that you need to be GREAT-LOOKING & surround yourself with similar people… … His son, Kyle (ALEX PETTYFER), has FOLLOWED in his dad’s mis-steps in that regard, & (likewise) acts like an arrogant ass.

Alex is very “open” in his attitude, & declares his belief that people need to be particularly ATTRACTIVE physically during his campaign to be a Class President at a fancy private high school in the New York area. While much of the school is “awed” with his conceits (including his attitude that people “suck” if they’re not beautiful), he does not really impress a pretty girl Lindy (VANESSA HUDGENS) who is running for a lower office & who he’s never bothered to really talk to in her 3 years at the school.

Further, his condescensions and thoughtless treatment deeply antagonizes a Goth-like girl named Kendra (MARY-KATE OLSEN). When he goes out of his way to be hurtful to her, she puts a CURSE on him: To teach him a lesson, Alex loses his head hair & he becomes downright “BEASTLY” — with ugly red gouges in his face + upraised spider-like VEINS & “vine” designs there & elsewhere on his body. And, above his left eye, there’s an apropos tattoo etching of the word “SUCK”. Yes, it’s a “take-off” on the “BEAUTY & THE BEAST” story, & Alex gets very depressed & angry when his “six-pack” becomes a “broken case”.

His dad takes him to doctors, but when he learns they can’t do anything to help his condition, he puts Alex in an out-of-the-way location & basically SHUNS him. Alex is given just the help of a Caribbean housekeeper named Zola (LISA GAY HAMILTON) who Alex has been unkind to as long as he’s known her, + a tutor named Will (NEIL PATRICK HARRIS).

Neil is blind & takes no “guff” from Alex, since he’s unwilling to indulge someone who’s already clearly badly SPOILED & uncaring about the people & world around him. Alex had been told by Mary-Kate that the only way she’d remove the curse from him is if he found someone who’d sincerely say she LOVES & kisses him within 1 year. There are precious few “candidates” for that role, but Alex hesitantly goes after Vanessa. She has grown up with a druggie father (– sort of the “modern” touch to the old story! –), & Alex gets her father to let him care for Vanessa since the dad is clearly incapable of doing that properly. Alex is timid about even letting Vanessa SEE him at first.

But, eventually, he follow’s Neil’s straightforward advise, “listens” to her, & eventually starts becoming more THOUGHTFUL towards her (& others). Eventually, following the other “contemporary” touch of being “Green”, he even tries building her a GREENHOUSE with pretty flowers. Will Alex start to truly change INSIDE as a person? Will Vanessa be able to NOT see Alex as “Beastly”? Will Alex’s Dad ever reconcile with him? Will Alex be able to find someone who’ll truly LOVE him & be able to break the SPELL he’s under?

Although the writing is often fairly weak, it’s nevertheless a cute little story. NEIL has the best “lines” in the film– clever, funny & well-delivered. The other major actors do well with the sort of “partially-deveveloped” characters they’re given to play (Alex is better & has more to “do” in his “I AM NUMBER 4″ role). Accordingly, since it’s enjoyable in a “light” way, I’m rating it as 7 out of 10 stars.

alex esmail shirtless, alex esmail, alex esmail race, beastly ending, where does alex esmail live, Is alex esmail still acting?
Home » dir » David Marks & Katie Mccarthy True Story

Vanishing on 7th Street (2010)

This movie had so much potential but in the end, it was nothing but an unfinished, unexplained, mess with no questions answered & a cheesy, stupid ending.

Imagine this: a normal morning in your everyday big city – taxis, cars, people, etc.. all going about their lives when suddenly, with no warning, a wave of darkness washes over the city wiping away all electrical light as well as daylight instantly – the darkness lets up and everyone is gone, nothing but their clothing from where they once stood, remains.

Who survives? A man working at a movie theater who had a battery powered headlight(Leguizamo). A man who was sleeping near lit candles (Christensen). A woman who had just stepped out to take a smoke break & opened the lighter at the exact second it happened (Newton)..people who were near prevailing light sources when the darkness came.

Now there is a fight for survival against the darkness that seems to be quickly taking over any light left – daylight becomes increasingly scarce w/ night lasting longer & daytime lasting shorter. Batteries used for flashlights keep dying, lasting at first hours on end but quickly dying out after minutes. Nearly all cars are dead – batteries drained. The survivors are trapped in a city (specifically 7th street) that is being taken over by night, a darkness that will take you unless you are surrounded by light.

Sounds interesting, right? I know.. this movie had so much promise which makes the execution so frustrating. I wish someone would have told me going into it not to try and figure out what was happening. With most psychological thrillers or horror films like this, creepy/odd things happen & then in the end, an explanation is given for what happened & why. I kept trying to find clues, piece them together & figure out what the initial darkness was, why it was light vs. dark, why the daylight was getting shorter, why light sources were dying at rapid rates, etc.. & how the darkness had a mind of it’s own since it is shown in the movie that the darkness thinks & has the ability to create fake light sources as well as add in loved ones’ voices to draw the survivors out, thinking they are safe and without warning the light goes out and the person is taken instantly.

…but alas nothing is ever explained. The audience is just supposed to accept what happened as an unexplained disappearance & take it for what it is – so beware – don’t bother trying to piece together what is happening, that is too advanced of a concept for this film.

I want to be clear that this is NOT some high concept, brilliant movie that answers some questions in a vague, thought provoking manner that leaves the audience drawing their own conclusions.. movies like that can be quite interesting. Just b/c this film doesn’t answer questions about what is happening & why, doesn’t magically make it ‘brilliant’ or ‘smart’ – this film is straight forward with a disappearance of a population, a light vs. dark scenario and the explanation that it’s just an unexplained disappearance which isn’t any explanation at all.

3/10 Utter failure – anyone can come up with some crazy concept, the true talent is putting all the parts together to explain the truth behind the mystery or what is really happening & this movie doesn’t even bother. Also, I found it hard to sympathize/care about any of the leads. I didn’t really care if they lived or died (do they even really die? Who knows – again.. what happens to those that disappear was never explained) Also, the movie comes to a halt about 30 minutes in when a place called Sonny’s Bar comes into play – and never really get back to where it was going. Finally, expect the usual problem of characters acting stupidly in this movie – when someone is in need of a light source & is desperate, FIRE come to mind especially when surrounded by alcohol in a bar & there is tons of fuel at their disposal from the cars in the streets – too bad no one could take that mental leap.

Just to be clear, the idea that it’s a reboot or some Adam/Eve scenario which I saw some people trying to sell as answers is NOT an explanation – that is just a potential reason for what happened but still doesn’t answer anything about how it happened. If the people turn into the darkness/shadows when they are taken, then what was the darkness made of when it initially came – it was obviously large & powerful enough to take over everything & wipe out ALL electrical light so what was that? Why light vs. dark? What was going on with Leguizamo’s character’s death? etc…

Also – the Adam/Eve idea based on the boy/girl in the end makes NO sense given the ending of the film. If they road off into the sunset w/ daylight shining upon them, then I might buy that (as a reason for what happened, NOT as an actual explanation as to how it happened) BUT that is not the case. As the boy/girl ride off, the shadows/darkness can be seen taking back over the city w/ night fall coming signaling to the audience that whatever is happening is NOT over. If the girl’s magical flashlight dies – then I am assuming she & the boy will be gone just like everyone else. There was no indication in the end that the occurrence was over so clearly the 2 kids are not the chosen ones so that theory doesn’t work.

by PhantomAgony from United States (IMDB)

atm movie ending, what happens at the end of the movie atm, atm ending explained, what happens at the end of atm, atm movie ending explained, shame ending explained

Page 1 of 5112345...102030...Last »

66 queries. 0.583 seconds.